Trump Didn’t Just Change the Presidency—He Changed Us
Trump didn’t dismantle democracy. He rewired how we participate in it—and what we expect from it.
Donald Trump didn’t just bend the powers of the presidency to his will. He reshaped the cultural ground it rests on. The transformation wasn’t limited to policy or institutions. It reached deeper—into how we speak, how we argue, what we expect from leadership, and how we define truth.
He didn’t invent the politics of resentment, but he gave it a new aesthetic. He wrapped grievance in spectacle and sold it as authenticity. Authoritarian performance wasn’t his creation, but he turned it into a daily ritual. He didn’t have to destroy democratic norms. He only had to wear them thin enough that we forgot what they were.
What made this transformation so effective wasn’t just the brazenness of his actions. It was the culture that absorbed them. Rule-breaking became charisma. Cruelty read as strength. Indifference to facts passed for candor. These weren’t just political moves; they were cultural signals. Trump turned the presidency into a performance—and turned the public into an audience.
This didn’t happen in isolation. It built on long-standing fractures: economic betrayal, racial grievance, media distrust. But Trump grasped something others missed: that power today flows through attention. He captured it by treating politics as spectacle—conflict, drama, and a singular protagonist at the center.
The result was a collapse of the line between governance and entertainment. The State of the Union became theater. Press briefings became feuds. Even disasters became stages. But the performance wasn’t random. It distracted, distorted, and, above all, dominated.
This wasn’t just strategy. It was a form of rule. Anthropologists have long noted that symbolic power can be more enduring than brute force. Trump converted cultural friction into political momentum. He offered a myth of greatness to those already inside the shrinking circle of belonging.
Many joined not because they were fooled, but because the performance met a need. In a time of uncertainty and decline, Trump offered clarity—an enemy to blame, a script to follow, and a community to join. That is how spectacle works. It doesn’t require belief. It only requires participation.
The damage runs deeper than constitutional norms. Trump left a public more fractured, a discourse more toxic, and a political field where mimicry replaces leadership. Even his critics speak in his register—amplifying outrage, framing governance as conflict, and performing opposition as spectacle.
He didn’t just change the presidency. He changed everyone who operates around it: the press, the courts, Congress, and voters. The gravitational pull of his style has outlasted his term. It shapes school board meetings, online debates, and the language of protest.
That’s the deeper cost—not just broken systems, but bent expectations. And once a culture bends, restoration is harder than repair.
Recovery won’t come through counterperformance. It will require rebuilding the civic habits that spectacle erodes: patience, deliberation, humility, and care. These are not ornaments. They are the framework of democracy. Trump didn’t dismantle that framework. He made its absence feel normal.
Undoing that shift will take more than resistance. It will take reinvention. Not just saying no to the legacy he left, but yes to another way of being public—one rooted in truth, responsibility, and shared purpose.
That is the challenge now. Trump didn’t just change what power looks like. He changed what we expect of one another.
Suggested Readings
Arendt, Hannah. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt, 1951.
Berlant, Lauren. Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2011.
Brown, Wendy. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books, 2015.
Dean, Jodi. Crowds and Party. London: Verso, 2016.
Hall, Stuart et al. Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State and Law and Order. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1978.
Mazzarella, William. The Mana of Mass Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.
Mbembe, Achille. Necropolitics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2019.
Stanley, Jason. How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them. New York: Random House, 2018.
The change begins with recognition.
I suspect Trump is a result rather than a cause. A symptom rather than the disease.
I'm an 82-year-old unapologetic Harry Truman style democrat. My kids are in their 40s & 50s now. One of the things I noticed when they were growing up was their low threshold of boredom and constant need for stimulation. Now we have a generation raised on "devices".
What could possibly go wrong?